From: | Hector MacQueen <hector.macqueen@ed.ac.uk> |
To: | John Murphy <john.murphy@manchester.ac.uk> |
CC: | obligations@uwo.ca |
Date: | 25/11/2008 08:05:18 UTC |
Subject: | Re: roffey discussion |
Why should students not be able to read and participate in this
discussion? I would resist those simply asking questions and hoping
others will provide answers - but I see no harm in them engaging in
the discussion properly and using the insights they gain from the
discussion in their own work, just as I imagine other members of the
group do.
Hector
--
Hector L MacQueen
Professor of Private Law
Co-Director, AHRC Research Centre Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Edinburgh Law School
University of Edinburgh
Edinburgh EH8 9YL
UK
Tel: (0)131-650-2060; Fax: (0)131-662-6317
Quoting John Murphy <john.murphy@manchester.ac.uk>:
> Dear All,
>
> I've been staying out of this discussion until now because I don't
> think it is a good idea to provide the student who prompted it with
> just the kind of information that s/he was looking for.
>
> That said, I now feel bound to say that I am surprised that so many
> people see Williams v Roffey as such a special or startling decision.
> Yeah, it's controversial; but there's nothing new about controvesrial
> consideration cases. From an ever-failing memory I seem to recall that
> Treitel and Atiyah had some kind of spat about consideration cases at
> the margins (nominal versus "invented" consideration?). And what about
> Nigel Simmonds' essay, "Bluntness and Bricolage", which explored and
> revealed years ago (in Gross and Hyman (eds): JURISPRUDENCE: CAMBRIDGE
> ESSAYS) the way that certain consideration cases seemed either to
> twist, or have very little genuine connection with, received wisdom on
> consideration?
>
> As I say, there's nothing really new about the kind of discussion that
> Roffey prompts. Its novelty, for me, lies purely in the fact that it
> is (in contract law terms, at least) a new case.
>
> Finally and most importantly, though, what can be done to stop other
> students infiltritating this discussion group. I'd hate it to get to
> the stage where I almost automatically reach for the delete key when I
> receive an ODG message.
>
> John M
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.